 |
| March
2004 |
 |
Vol.23
No.2 |
| A
publication of the International Sculpture Center |
New
York
Rebecca Welz
June Kelly
by Jonathan Goodman
<Back
to Contents page>
 |
|
Rebecca
Welz, installation view of June Kelly Gallery exhibition.
|
The luminous constructions
of Rebecca Welz appear to have been made both by nature and by hand. Composed
of folded sheets of Plexiglas, the sculptures translucently glow as light
passes through them. The mechanics of their making are relatively simple:
Welz heats and then folds the fiberglass, which has been previously sanded.
The work is then stained with oil paint and re-sanded by hand, after which
it is again stained, but not so heavily that the light is blocked from
traveling through the piece. There is a lovely patina on the surface of
the sculptures, the consequence of their staining, but they also bear
the scratches incurred as the result of sanding. The shapes of the sculptures
remind the viewer of the nautilus shell, built upon segmented chambers
that coil or uncoil to form their overall shape. Mostly hung from the
ceiling, Welzs works feel like inspired pieces of natural architecture,
fragments of a totality only rarely realized in life.
In fact, the closest
analogy to these works is found in stained glass, whose luminescence radiates
a spirituality that is, perhaps, not so very far from Welzs own
intentions. It is interesting to think of the work as conversing with
both the leisurely organicism of nature and the faster, more right-angled
productions of culture, present in the sculptures nod to such manmade
forms as waterwheels or windmills. The ethereality of Welzs colorsgreens,
blues, oranges, reds, and yellowssuggests a primarily transcendent
understanding of form, while the shapes themselves hover between what
might occur in the world and what might occur in the mind. As the sculptures
slowly twist and turn in the spotlights hung from the gallerys ceiling,
the viewer imagines a world that is slowly evolving, changing over time
in the same way a natural form might eventually change in response to
its being used for a differing purpose. If it is true that form most often
mediates experience rather than becoming the experience itself, it would
hold true that Welz offers us works that point to the way nature develops
and expands its shapeswithout asserting that art must stand for
something other than what it is.
It is this resistance
to symbolic assertion that characterizes, indeed strengthens, the subtle
yet resolute diffusion of form that occurs so regularly in Welzs
work. At the same time, it must be said that while Welz eschews the notion
of a language meant to suggest something other than formthe sculptures
are what they areit is also true that she rejects the idea of a
cramped literalism in which what you see is merely what you get. In Hot
Moon (2002), two coiled formsthe top mostly a reddish orange and
the bottom mostly a dusky bluepirouette from a cable attached to
the ceiling; they are at once beautiful and ever so slightly mysterious.
And in Falling (2002), we can see three pieces floating atop each other,
stopped from their descent as if suspended, momentarily, in mid-fall.
Finally, in Orb Triad (2002), the viewer encounters a large coil suspended
between two smaller ones. There is a suggestion here, as there often is
in Welzs pieces, of incompletion: the truncated coils look as though
they are fragments of a composition that has just exploded or is about
to complete itself.
Welz is an artist
clearly given to beautya dangerous subject these days. Her sculptures
are remarkable for their steady poise and address of formal values, without
which they might be no more than discarded scraps. Of course we recognize
that the contemporary aesthetic finds the part greater than the whole;
however, we are also aware that this perception is a couple of centuries
old, being a hallmark of the Romantic eye. As Welzs work shifts
and sways in the gallery, we realize that we are being offered a view
of things that suggests both the old and the new, the unfinished and the
realized. Beauty is an especially difficult thing to achieve in these
days of theory and willful political interpretation, yet Welz takes her
chances. It would be easier for her to move with current tendencies in
art rather than against or around them, just as it would be easier for
her to make art that fulfilled only one goal or intention. We are lucky,
then, that the artist sees her role as richly diverse, as the consequence
of a process more than usually complex.
|